Dollar diplomacy played a significant role in another Latin American Country: Mexico. Though many Mexicans uneasily referred to the United States as "the Colossus of the North," economic ties between the two countries increased in the late 19th century. But the Mexican Revolution of 1910 threatened these ties, bringing the two countries to the brink of war. (Click on the link to watch the video)
*The Mexican Revolution*
Your Assignment:
1) Who was Pancho Villa and Emiliano Zapata?
2) What was the main conflict between President Wilson and U.S. Ambassador Wilson?
3) Who was Venustiano Carranza?
Due: Sunday 3/7/10 by no later than 11:59pm
Tuesday, March 2, 2010
21 comments:
Remember this is 3 test grade points! Answer the questions fully and completely. 3/3=100%, 2/3=66%, 1/3=33%. Failure to complete blog or a violation of blogging rules will lead to a 0/3=0%. It is your responsibility to complete the blogs sufficiently and on time. Your blog grades are updated on the grade web page. Make sure to check your grades often!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Pancho Villa and Emiliano Zapata each had a revolutionary army that fought Victoriano Huerta.
ReplyDeleteHenry Lane Wilson did not believe Madero could protect U.S investments in Mexico. Wilson then overstepped his diplomatic role by arranging for factions opposed to Madero to meet and discuss Madero's overthrow.
A mexican revolutionary. He fought with Madero and after he was deposed, carranza helped defeat Huerta's forces. After the victory he became president.
1.) Zapta was a leading figure in the mexican revolution and Villa was one of the most prominent Mexican Revolutionary generals.
ReplyDelete2.) Henry Lane Wilson did no belive Madero could protect U.S. investments in Mexico.
3.) He ultimately became President of Mexico following the overthrow of the dictatorial Huerta regime in the summer of 1914 and during his administration the current constitution of Mexico was drafted.
1.) Pancho Villa decided to retaliate against the Americans for recognizing Carranza as president. Emiliano Zapata was a rebel leader that was helping Villa.
ReplyDelete2.) Ambassador Wilsion didn't believe that Madero could protect U.S. intvestigation in Mexico. President Wislon was outraged when Madero was killed.
3.) He assumed the presidency in 1915. He was born in 1859 in the northern state of Mexico, he was over 50 years old when he took up the rebel cause. Carranza helped defeat Huerta's force.
Emiliano Zapata was a leading figure in the Mexican Revolution, which broke out in 1910 and which was initially directed against the president Porfirio Díaz He formed and commanded an important revolutionary force
ReplyDeleteJosé Doroteo Arango Arámbula 5 June 1878 – 20 July 1923 better known by his pseudonym Francisco Villa or its hypocorism Pancho Villa was one of the most prominent Mexican Revolutionary generals.
Ambassador Wilson did not believe madero could protect us investments
Venustiano Carranza was one of the leaders of the Mexican Revolution. He ultimately became President of Mexico following the overthrow of the dictatorial Huerta regime in the summer of 1914 and during his administration the current constitution of Mexico was drafted
Pancho Villa hope dfor U.S. support against Cazzranza, Carranza decided to retaliate against the Americans.
ReplyDeleteEmiliano Zapata was a rebel leader that Caranza communicated his plans to.
The conflict was that Wilson overstepped his boundaries when you used force against the mexican rebels.
Pancho Villa and Emiliano Zapata were two of the four leaders that controlled territory throughout mexico.
ReplyDeleteThe main conflict between President Wilson and U.S. ambassador Wilson was that Henry Lane Wilson did not believe Madero oould protect U.S. investments in Mexico. Wilson overstepped his diplomatic role by arranging for factions opposed to Madero to meet and discuss Maderos overthrow.
Venustiano Carranza assumed the presidency in 1915 and the american forces withdrew from Veracruz.
1) Pancho Villa was one of the most prominent Mexican Revolutionary generals and Emiliano Zapata formed and commanded an important revolutionary force. Both were leaders through the Mexican War.
ReplyDelete2) The main conflict between the President Wilson and U.S. Ambassador Wilson was the Ambassador did not believe Maderno could protect US investments in Mexico. Wilson overstepped his diplomatic role by arranging for factions opposed to Maderno to meet and discuss Maderno's overthrow.
3) Venustiano Carranza was one of the leaders of the Mexican Revolution.
Pancho Villa was one of the leaders and Emiliano Zapata was a rebel leader.
ReplyDeleteOverthrowing the antirevolutionary Huerta government.
He was a man who owned a large, profitable ranch, he had helf many government offices under Diaz.
Pancho Villa and Emiliano Zapata were two of the four leaders of th revolutionary armies. Pancho Villa decided to retaliate against the americans for recognizing Carranza as president.
ReplyDeleteHenry Lane Wilson, the Us ambassador, did not believe thath Madero could protect Us investments in Mexico. Wilson overstepped his diplomatic role by arranging for factions opposed to Madero to meet and discus Madero's overthrow. Madero's murder outraged President Woodrow Wilson. He refused to recognize Huerta, calling his regime a "government of butcher." Civil War raged in Mexico as revolutionary armies battled to drive Huerta out. Pres. Wilson adopted a policy of "watchful waiting."
Venustiano Carranza held many government offices under Diaz. He was 50 years old when he took up the rebel cause. He and Diaz began to clash and he joined Madero's fight to overthrow him. He used his experience as head of a revolutionary army and his considerable political talents to gain the presidency of Mexico.
1. Pancho Villa and Emiliano Zapata were leaders, controlled territories throughtout Mexico.
ReplyDelete2. The U.S. ambassador did not believe Madero could protect U.S. investments in Mexico. Wilson over stepped his deplomatic role by arranging for faction opposed to Madero to meet and dicuss Madero's overthrow.
3. Venustiano Carranza was a leader and did not get along with Villa. He helped defeat Huerta's forces.
Pancho Villa and Emiliano Zapata were leaders had revolutionary armies that were trying to overthrow Huerta.
ReplyDeleteHenry Lane Wilson did not believe that Madero could protect United States investments. Wilson wanted to overthrow Madero. Madero was eventually murdered by General Huerta. Wilson was enraged by this and was hoping that the revolutionaries would overthrow him.
Venustiana Carranza was the man that assumed the presidency after Huerta died. Carranza was a profitable rancher that had held many government offices. Carranza also wanted to have a new constitution for Mexico, but he never got it put into place because he was overthrown and was killed.
Pancho Villa, was one of the most prominent Mexican Revolutionary generals.Emiliano Zapata Salazar (August 8, 1879 – April 10, 1919) was a leading figure in the Mexican Revolution, which broke out in 1910, and which was initially directed against the president Porfirio Díaz. He formed and commanded an important revolutionary force, the Liberation Army of the South, during the Mexican Revolution.
ReplyDeleteHenry Lane Wilson the us ambaasador did not believe madero could protect the us investments in mexico. wilson overstepped his diplomatic role by arranging for fractions opposed to meet and dicuss madero's overthrow.
Venustiano Carranza de la Garza (December 29, 1859 – May 21, 1920) was one of the leaders of the Mexican Revolution. He ultimately became President of Mexico following the overthrow of the dictatorial Huerta regime in the summer of 1914 and during his administration the current constitution of Mexico was drafted. He was assassinated near the end of his term of office at the behest of a cabal of army generals resentful at his insistence that his successor be a civilian.
Pancho Villa and Emiliano Zapata were two leaders that fought against Huerta. However, both of these leaders were not united, nor the other two leaders, so their armies were not efficient in their fighting efforts.
ReplyDeleteThe conflicts between the Wilsons was that the Ambassador wanted to send in troops to protect U.S. investments. This was not agreed upon, but he did it anyway, complicating and intensifying the Mexican and U.S. relations and negotiations.
Venustiano Carranza took over the Mexican presidency in 1915, but three years after taking over it, he joined to fight with Madero and overthrow Diaz. He was murdered in 1920 by the forces of Alvaro Obregon, who also wanted the Presidency.
1.) They hated each other...leaders of their armies.
ReplyDelete2.) they fought for the presidents spot.
3.) He assumed presidency.
1) Pancho Villa hoped for U.S. support against Carranza. Emiliano Zapata was the rebel leader to which Pancho communicated his plans to.
ReplyDelete2) Amnbassador Wilson overstepped his boundries. He talked to people about overthrowing Madero and supported Huerta. Madero was murdered and that outraged President Wilson.
3) Carranza was a large ranch owner that joined the rebel cause after he was 50 years old. He joined Madero's fight to overthrow Diaz.
1)Pancho was a leader ofsrevolutionary armies, who had hoped for U.S. support against Carranza. Emiliano Zapata was rebel leader. He communicated Villa's plans to Villa.
ReplyDelete2)Henry Lane Wilson didn't belived Madero could protect U.S. investments in Mexico.Wilson overstepped his diplomatic role and Victoriano Huerta had Madro thrown into jail.Madero's murder outraged Woodrow Wilson. He refused to recognize Huerta, calling his regime a "government of butchers" and he also authorized arms sales to the revolutionaries.
3)Venustiano Carranza had held many government offices under Diaz.But when he clashed,he joined Madero's fight to overthrow Diaz. He used his experience as head of a revolutionary army and his considerabele political talents to gain the presidency of Mexico.
3)
1.) They are leaders of revolutionary armies trying to overthrow Huerta.
ReplyDelete2.) The U.S. Ambassador Wilson doesn't care about Madero. President Wilson was very angry with the murder of Madero.
3.) He was the president of Mexico in 1915.
1.) They were leaders of rebellion against Mexicos government.
ReplyDelete2.) Henry Lane Wilson the ambassador backed Huerta and the overthrow of Madero, but president Wilson didn't.
3.) He was a revolutionary leader that assumed presidency after the conflicts.
Pancho Villa decided to retaliate against the Americans for recognizing Carranza as president. Emiliano Zapata was a rebel leader that was helping Villa.
ReplyDeleteThe main conflict between President Wilson and U.S. ambassador Wilson was that Henry Lane Wilson did not believe Madero oould protect U.S. investments in Mexico. Wilson overstepped his diplomatic role by arranging for factions opposed to Madero to meet and discuss Maderos overthrow.
A mexican revolutionary. He fought with Madero and after he was deposed, carranza helped defeat Huerta's forces. After the victory he became president.
Both Pancho Villa and Emiliano Zapata were revolutionaries that fought for Mexican freedoms. Henry Lane Wilson believed that Madero couldnt protect US investments in Mexico. Wilson overstepped his diplomatic role by meeting and discussing Maderos overthrow. Venustiano Carranza fought with Madero to defeat Huertas forces and became president.
ReplyDeletethey were two of the members who controlled parts of mexican territory
ReplyDeleteHenry Lane Wilson did not believe that Madero could protect United States investments. ambassador wilson was mad when he was killed
a large ranch owner that joined the rebel cause after he was 50 years old. He joined Madero's fight to overthrow Diaz.